April 1, 2009 · 2:57 am
[Note – Though we have known these general figures, DOE has today issued a news release on what the sites are getting in “clean up” stimulus funds, including $1.96 billion to Hanford and $1.61 billion to SRS. DOE-EM continues to insist that these funds will be used leveraged into “energy parks,” which DOE has made clear could include commercial spent fuel storage and reprocessing at SRS if the “community” (aka contractors) wants it. Tom Clements]
Department of Energy
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Contact Number – (202) 586-4940
New Funding Will Create Jobs and Accelerate Cleanup Efforts
Energy Secretary Steven Chu today announced $6 billion in new funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to accelerate environmental cleanup work and create thousands of jobs across 12 states. Projects identified for funding will focus on accelerating cleanup of soil and groundwater, transportation and disposal of waste, and cleaning and demolishing former weapons complex facilities.
“These investments will put Americans to work while cleaning up contamination from the cold war era,” said Secretary Chu. “It reflects our commitment to future generations as well as to help local economies get moving again.”
These projects and the new funding are managed by the Department’s Office of Environmental Management, which is responsible for the risk reduction and cleanup of the environmental legacy from the nation’s nuclear weapons program, one of the largest, most diverse and technically complex environmental programs in the world.
The states and DOE sites that will receive this funding include: Continue reading →
Filed under Environmental
Tagged as American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Argonne National Laboratory, Brookhaven, Carlsbad, contaminated areas, contaminated soil, cooling towers, Department of Energy, East Fork Poplar Creek, East Tennessee Technology Park, environmental impact statement, ETEC, groundwater plume, Hanford, high-level waste canisters, Idaho National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Manhattan Project, Miamisburg, mill tailings, Moab, Nevada Test Site, North Field Land Area, Nuclear, nuclear facilities, nuclear research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, off-site mercury release, Office of Environmental Management, Office of River Protection, Operable Unit 1, Paducah, Portsmouth, radioactive waste disposal, radioactive waste treatment, radiological assessments, radiological facilities, Richland Operations Office, Savannah River Site, Separations Process Research Unit, SLAC, SPRU, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Statutory Reimbursement, Steven Chu, transuranic waste, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, uranium enrichment, uranium mill tailings, Uranium Thorium Payments, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, West Valley, Y-12 sites
March 19, 2009 · 4:01 pm
March 18, 2009
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed the agency staff to draft amendments to regulations regarding low-level radioactive waste to accommodate disposal of large amounts of depleted uranium.
In a Staff Requirements Memorandum issued March 18, the Commission accepted the staff’s recommendation that the agency continue to consider depleted uranium as Class A low-level waste, but amend regulations in 10 CFR Part 61 to require a site-specific analysis for the disposal of large quantities of depleted uranium and the technical requirements for such an analysis. The Commission also directed the staff to develop a guidance document for public comment that outlines the parameters and assumptions to be used in conducting the site-specific analyses.
The Commission stressed that the rulemaking was not intended to change the current classification of depleted uranium as Class A waste. “Eventual changes to waste classification designations in the regulations must be analyzed in light of the total amount of depleted uranium being disposed of at any given site,” the Commission said in its memorandum.
The Commission noted, however, that for “significant amounts of depleted uranium, there may be a need to place additional restrictions on the disposal of the depleted uranium at a specific site or deny such disposal based on unique site characteristics.” Those restrictions would be identified through the site-specific analysis, it said.
The Commission also directed the staff to conduct a public workshop with “all potentially affected stakeholders” to discuss issues associated with the disposal of depleted uranium, the potential issues to be considered in rulemaking, and technical parameters of concern in the analysis so that informed decisions can be made in the interim period until the regulatory changes are final.
Depleted uranium is the byproduct, or tails, of the uranium enrichment process, a key point in the production of fuel for nuclear power reactors. The staff proposal (SECY-08-147) fulfilled an earlier Commission directive in the adjudicatory proceeding regarding Louisiana Energy Services’ application for a license to construct and operate a gas centrifuge enrichment plant in New Mexico. That license was granted in June 2006, and the plant is now under construction.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at http://www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s Web site.
For citizens’ comment or information contact:
Marci R. Culley, Ph.D
Assistant Professor of Community Psychology
Department of Psychology
P.O. Box 5010
Georgia State University
Atlanta, GA 30302-5010
(404) 413-6266 (office)
(404) 413-6218 (fax)
Filed under Environmental, South Carolina
Tagged as Class A waste, DEPLETED URANIUM DISPOSAL, Environmental, gas centrifuge enrichment, Louisiana Energy Services, low-level radioactive waste, Marci R. Culley, rulemaking, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, uranium enrichment